Missing objective · None
How to choosebetween several schemes?
First check whether the constraints can be met,then compare cost and operating performance.More expensive does not automatically mean more suitable.
Results come from the local draft and the live engine /api/design (Pareto + automatic design optimization).
Local draft nodes / edges · Unknown
State your preference
Preference input is not wired in this batch.A real integration must state whether cost or losses weigh more,and the hard constraints;preset weights must not be passed off as user intent.
With no preference,start comparing from the knee point
No frontier candidate
The knee point is a compromise heuristic for the no-preference case,not the optimal scheme,and not a recommendation for you.
| Candidate | Cost (LCC basis) | Active power loss | Sum of squared voltage violations | Max branch loading | Comparability & constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No frontier candidate | |||||
IRR unavailable (not returned by the engine)
Anything the engine does not return is shown as unknown/unavailable — never defaulted to 0.
Net present value NPV
Unknown
Initial capex CAPEX
Unknown
Only comparable under the same evaluation period and discount conditions.
Scheme evidence & selection basis
No frontier candidateEconomic and constraint evidence
Front size: Unknown · Cost range: Unknown
Engine selection method
Unknown
Automatic design optimization (decision variables & candidates)
Unknown